• Announcements

    • Brentonator

      Forum Rules (Please Read)

      Hello everyone and welcome to the No More Room In Hell Forums! We greatly appreciate your interest and support. Please feel free to begin post and become a part of this community. But please make sure that you read and understand the following rules so things can stay as clean and as orderly as possible around here. These rules are expected to be follow by any and all members at all times. Disobeying these rules will result in disciplinary action by a moderator. #1. Off color remarks are acceptable but can be deemed inappropriate at the discretion of the moderators. #2. Flaming and disrespecting other members of this community or this mod is strictly prohibited. #3. Please do not post links relating to warez or illegal downloading. #4. No offensive content is to be posted (gore, dead babies, porn). #5. Please do not spam topics to increase your post count. #6. No excessively large signatures. Signatures that violate this will be modified. #7. Signatures are not to be used as a spamming tool. If your signature's sole purpose is to annoy or distract other members, it will be removed. #8. Please do your part to be as friendly, respectful, and helpful to anyone and everyone on this forum. #9. Your posts may be removed at any time at our sole discretion. #10. Remember the terms of your registration...a copy is posted below but may not represent the latest version of our terms of use. #11. No advertising other communities or products. Have fun.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Stabbity Style

Obama

45 posts in this topic

Obama just won the Nobel Peace Prize. That's pretty cool. Also, it came out of fucking nowhere. Discuss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got no objections to him winning it... If that was george bush then i would.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we just handing out awards now? He has not done litterly one fucking thing! Not only is he president that will run us more into the ground, but he gets rewarded for doing nothing?! THE FUCK!! I've been saying it since I found his plans out;

"DROP HIM!!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama said he was surprised and deeply humbled by the honor, and planned to travel to Oslo in December to accept the prize.

"Let me be clear: I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments, but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations," he said at the White House. "To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize."

Obama will donate the $1.4 million cash award that comes with the prize to charity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is pretty retarded... To be fair though, the Nobel Peace Prize have been given to worse people... But to be given one just because you are not George W. Bush? Hilarious. And if it's somehow in recognition of him being the first African-American President, or whatever, then it should go to the voters... Which would be a bit tricky, seeing thats quite a few winnurrrrrrs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fear, you misspelt North America in your location and dident even notice it untill someone screencapped and posted it. I feel that you are out of your element here, even a little more than the rest of us internet fools, and that's saying alot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fear, you misspelt North America in your location and dident notice it untill someone screencapped and posted it. I feel that you are out of your element here, even a little more than the rest of us internet fools, and that's saying alot.

Have you ever been so mad at something or someone (not mad at you) that you litterly can feel your face get hot? Your words mixed up?

That is me now, now if you'll excuse me I am going to play my Necrophilia game (Midnight Nowhere) and kill a few people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.p...66241&ps=rs

I agree with them that it's the committee supporting what Obama is trying to achieve, sort of like an international approval of Obama's direction.

Let me throw in what I think about that specifically. I don't think we can call a collection of speeches an actual direction. Any world leader can talk about peace, and often does. I'm not saying that to critique Obama or anyone that likes him, it's just that America is at the moment involved in two wars they can not end safely, a peace prize won't change that. As far as policy is concerned, especially foreign policy, Obama has done very few changes. The rhetoric in his speeches though, his way of talking to non-US muslims especially, and the fact that the two liberal candidates for the presidential election was a female and a black guy, are all good and positive things. But there's been barely no change in American foreign policy so far, and really nothing significant on the horizon. Giving him the award just feels... stupid. But that's on the committé. Might be worth adding that this is the first time any US President currently holding office have been awarded the Nobel Peace prize, and it happend in his first year no less.

Thanks to Obama you won't have to worry about Europeans spitting in your food when you're here on holiday though, atleast! I'm trying to be positive about all this, but Americas role in the world, and reality for that matter, won't magicly change thanks to Obama. He seems like an alright fella though and very much preferable to anyone like Bush or McCain. He might achieve something great during his term as President, as far as peace is concerned, but I'm not seeing it. On the other hand, I'm pretty retarded.

tldr: Fear is indeed a twat, and this is post is only one third as long as any potential Noobbot reply to this thread. preemptive tldr for that post that may or may not come: the free market is indeed a powerful wizard, lulz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently, the Nobel Peace Prize laureates include: Woodrow Wilson, whose state committed the US to the first world war and indirectly resulted in the second; Mother Theresa, a masochistic whore's cunt who enjoyed deferring her own inclination toward bondage acts onto others; Yassr Arafat, who was quite simply a faggot with a terribly ugly mug; and Jimmy Carter, a retarded Southern tit. There were other undesirables on the list (almost the entire fucking thing), but those seemed to be the highlights. It's a meaningless award, as most are. As far as I'm concerned, many of the greatest things go largely unrecognized while mediocrity and deceit are rewarded with standing ovations.

Hah, my post is shorter than yours. Fuck you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hah, my post is shorter than yours. Fuck you.

See what I've achieved!

... Do we have any forum awards?

Coincidently, who would you like to give the Nobel Peace Prize to Noobbot? This is a serious question and I'm genuinly curious since you just dismissed quite a few notable people, by anyone's standards. Just pretend for a moment you were tasked with handing it out personally and pretend that you actually dident think it was just total bullshit. Who deserves the recognition? Anyone? Extra points if it's someone fairly recent, lets say, within the last 100-150 years or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
See what I've achieved!

... Do we have any forum awards?

Coincidently, who would you like to give the Nobel Peace Prize to Noobbot? This is a serious question and I'm genuinly curious since you just dismissed quite a few notable people, by anyone's standards. Just pretend for a moment you were tasked with handing it out personally and pretend that you actually dident think it was just total bullshit. Who deserves the recognition? Anyone? Extra points if it's someone fairly recent, lets say, within the last 100-150 years or so.

I'd like to present the award to Reinhard Heydrich, Karl Wolff, or Heinrich Himmler.

People like Ron Paul or that Dennis Kucinich guy deserve it far more than most of the laureates. At least they've truly opposed warfare and have never consented to acts thereof.

Post script: the last line with "Fuck you." in it was the result of an edit after I read your post. See, I posted before I even read yours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd like to present the award to Reinhard Heydrich, Karl Wolff, or Heinrich Himmler.

YOU FUCKING NAZI!! YOU ARE THE LOWEST FORM OF LIFE!! FUCK YOU!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am so tempted to get you I.P. right now and give you a slow painfull death. Prey I don't because I can.
Prey I don't because I can.
Prey I don't
Prey

You suck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like how people with the rank zombie can edit their posts without a trace even when there's been a reply. Even funnier when Fear doesnt realize how obvious it is when he's actually been quoted. Anywayyys...

People like Ron Paul or that Dennis Kucinich guy deserve it far more than most of the laureates. At least they've truly opposed warfare and have never consented to acts thereof.

Preemptive tldrs will still be the new forum trend, mark my words!

Ron Paul? Wouldn't he technically be accountable for all the conflicts that would arise from an instant withdrawal of all US troops from, well, everywhere? A likely all out civil war in Iraq and the warlords in Afghanistan to name but two, two pretty major problems. Plus without the US, the #1 military power, not leaning on them anymore could very well lead to Iran getting nuclear weapons. That combined with the Israeli/Palestinian-conflict could turn nasty, that's more speculation than the first two examples though. Then there's the cutting of all foreign aid, which would destabilize regions aswell.

Dennis Kucinich actually recieved the "Gandhi Peace Award" in 2003, so he's already gotten some form of a pat on the back. So let's talk about crummy old Ronnie. I realize that in theory there would be no more unjust US invasions under libertarian rule, or proxy-wars, sure, but there's other superpowers on the rise that would gladly step in and claim land in the middleeast. Do you have anyone else in mind with actual achievements rather than just ideals? And do you think that the hands off Ron Paul approach would greater aid the world, all its people and their need for stability and peace? Even in theory? I'm still seriously curious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You suck.

LOL. I'd love to see that faggot try an IP trace. If he can actually find his ass with the latest GPS kit and can color me surprised, I'd be willing to let him in the door.

I like how people with the rank zombie can edit their posts without a trace even when there's been a reply. Even funnier when Fear doesnt realize how obvious it is when he's actually been quoted. Anywayyys...

Preemptive tldrs will still be the new forum trend, mark my words!

Ron Paul? Wouldn't he technically be accountable for all the conflicts that would arise from an instant withdrawal of all US troops from, well, everywhere? A likely all out civil war in Iraq and the warlords in Afghanistan to name but two, two pretty major problems. Plus without the US, the #1 military power, not leaning on them anymore could very well lead to Iran getting nuclear weapons. That combined with the Israeli/Palestinian-conflict could turn nasty, that's more speculation than the first two examples though. Then there's the cutting of all foreign aid, which would destabilize regions aswell.

Dennis Kucinich actually recieved the "Gandhi Peace Award" in 2003, so he's already gotten some form of a pat on the back. So let's talk about crummy old Ronnie. I realize that in theory there would be no more unjust US invasions under libertarian rule, or proxy-wars, sure, but there's other superpowers on the rise that would gladly step in and claim land in the middleeast. Do you have anyone else in mind with actual achievements rather than just ideals? And do you think that the hands off Ron Paul approach would greater aid the world, all its people and their need for stability and peace? Even in theory? I'm still seriously curious.

Have you ever heard of what we in the business like to call the "marginal state"? That's a concept which states that, well, [nation-]states thrive mostly off of stone age cult ideology and silly utopian idealism. States do employ force at the margins, to keep the chattel in line (can't have a few trailblazers secede from the works and then have everyone else follow, can we?), hence the marginal state. Any would-be state that attempts to survive based mostly on force is a high marginal state and will fail without resources from foreign, ideologically-swayed chattel and superior firepower (i.e. the US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, which are still terrible messes). If you can't tie this into what you said, well, boy, there's no hope for you and I'll be forced to put you down for good.

tl;dr: The US occupations of the two aforementioned nations effectively amounts to jack shit. If there will be "chaos" or "anarchy" in the pejorative, then this will happen regardless of whether a few of Uncle Sam's petty whores are killed or not. Best to step aside and let blood be shed without "our" involvement.

Post-post script: Oh, nukes. Who gives a fuck?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That settles it then! I'm building the Noobbot/Nobel Peace Prize out of clay and mailing it to Mr Paul.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a much bigger fan of the "let's gather all of the Christians and statists and have a nice orgiastic barbecue" tactic. You tell me some people who you think were peace martyrs, and then I'll research them, and I'll tell you whether they're worth a shit with regards to this retarded award.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ron Paul deserves something for having a blimp that almost has "EVIL" written on the side.

And who could forget his edgy campaign posters:

ronupgrayedd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I got no objections to him winning it... If that was george bush then i would.

Lol, the only reason he won it is because he ISN'T George Bush. The only thing he's done since he came into office was put us deeper into national debt at a faster rate than the great George W. and for no great purpose. And all you fuckin' Canadians that give a shit about Obama clearly don't care enough to know about him, or you learn about him through his favorite pet, NBC.

EDIT: Also, the Nobel prize is now officially a joke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0