Search the Community: Showing results for tags 'pro'.
Found 1 result
At http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=355447#16, they were having an intelligent debat on which monitors' frame rate is better without asking this one simple question: If 5ms is quicker, then isn't it better, regardless of the difference? It's like they are chemists who know calculas and physical theories and SOMEHOW 2ms from A monitor using TN panel technology is better. In my point of view, their "deep thinking" is actually questioning: Does 5ms overload your computers ability to process images? In that reality, correct me if I'm wrong, a monitor that has a fast speed is the monitors' independent capability which does not affect the CPU's input on framerate. Therefore, if the CPU's framerate can handle higher, than a faster monitor framerate would be necessary for it. For my newer computer, I would also like to see if the TN panel would give me any fps boost even if it has limited specs. What do you guys think? I've already gave you everyone else's conversation, and what they haven't pointed out yet. So which should be better: 5ms or 2ms, because it's ridiculous to even think 2ms is better, if 5ms is quicker.